The Shape of Things To Come, or Faith-Based Sci-Fi As Exploratory Apologetic Re-Revisited


About 6 years ago, I wrote an essay that caused me to seriously think about writing something like Johnny Came Home.

At the time, I was writing Luckbane, a sci-fi tale with fantasy overtones. I was having a hard time finishing it, so I wrote this essay to sharpen my focus a bit. The idea was to define my over-all aim as what fellow author JC Lamont terms a “literary apologist.” I managed to do that, but the essay is more noteworthy for the brainstorming session it contains. I revisited the post 4 years afterward, expanding the idea pool. This updated version of Faith-Based Sci-Fi As Exploratory Apologetic continues in that tradition.



Now by all accounts science fiction is a bit of a hard sell for the Christian book market. The reason for this is partly bound up in our eschatology, our beliefs about the End of All Things. End Times views within Christendom come a few clearly defined and argued categories. Most folks are familiar with the Darbyist view [pretribulational dispensationalist Rapturists] on which Tim Lahaye and Jerry Jenkins’ Left Behind series was based. Once upon a time, I would have said that if Christendom had an established sci-fi market at all, it is predominantly for this specific flavor of End Times fiction. Happily, the landscape is changing.

Still, who could blame us for this Christian fixation on the End of Days? It’s exciting stuff. A small, desperate, but resolute band of believers beleaguered by the all-powerful AntiChrist, a megalomaniacal dictator in control of a fascist New World Order. The story has a powerful opening hook: the sudden disappearance of every Bible-believing Christian on the planet and climaxes in the bona fide War to End All Wars, the Armageddon, and the Triumphant Return of Christ. The setting and the Bible’s mention of martyrs and divine judgments make any half-decent effort a gripping read.

The trouble is that we have our future so well figured out that no one’s allowed to speculate about it. Of course, the Jews had the Messiah’s coming all figured out when they crucified Christ, so I tend to be wary of those who think they’ve got the future all figured out. And they do think they’ve got it all figured out! They’ll demur that no ne knows the day or the hour, but they’ve nailed the rest of it down. I wonder. If the whole world will be under a strong delusion and believe a lie [2 Thessalonians 2:11], I have to wonder how useful all of these proposed In Case of Rapture books and recordings will actually end up being.

I digress.

While the situation is starting to improve, it is not improving by a landslide. The reason I started writing books was because of the dearth of good speculative fiction in Christian bookstores. I remember browsing the local Christian bookstores, just bored out of my mind. With few exceptions, I was looking an endless sea of romance novels, marketed at women. I’m a guy, so I’m into science fiction, fantasy and action thrillers. I remember thinking, “Why should I be forced to get the stuff I actually enjoy reading from secular bookstores in novels written from a non- or even anti-Christian worldview?”

What about the stuff of traditional sci-fi? What about alien worlds? Aliens? Space travel? Artificial Intelligence? Where was the Christian exploration of these subjects? In essence, why couldn’t I read “Do Android Prayers Reach the Ears of God?” [in the tradition of “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”, the inspiration for the movie Blade Runner]?

Let me tell you some specific things I’d like to see addressed:

  1. How the Second Coming scenario would be affected by extraterrestrial colonies.

    What does the Rapture or the Second Coming look like from space? Let’s not make the mistake in our thinking that my grandfather’s generation commited when they boasted that God would not allow us to put a man on the moon because he hadn’t allowed man to finish the Tower of Babel. God didn’t allow man to finish the Tower because we had disobeyed His explicit command to inhabit the entire Earth; instead we were gathered in one place and God saw that disobedient mankind would be able to whatever evil they set their minds to if we remained united. It had nothing to do with some imaginary prohibition on reaching the heavens! The lesson of man reaching the moon [conspiarcy theories aside] is that we should never make the mistake that God will limit our horizons to keep our doctrines as simple as we’d like! In fact, that is the entire point of exploratory apologetics: to anticipate a Christian response to something we currently find implausible but which could come to pass in the future. My next point is a prime case-in-point.

  2. The possibility of non-sapient extraterrestrial lifeforms.

    I know that some special Creationists simply say that since the Bible is silent on life beyond this planet and since “extraterrestrial life is an evolutionary concept” [I think they’re referring to the idea that if the universe is billions of years old that some allege life elsewhere is almost inevitable. It’s not inevitable. Even if it did exist, our connecting with it is improbable], so there’s no such thing as extraterrestrial life. This is the sort of baseless dogma that has shot Christendom in the pants in the past. If the Bible is silent about a subject, it does not automagically [no, I didn’t mis-spell that] follow that it must not exist. An argument from silence is one of the weakest of all possible arguments. If it does exist and we have not considered that possibility, many will feel that our worldview has been invalidated because a few boneheads decided a priori that it was impossible based on negative evidence.It seems possible that the Revelation passage which speaks of Wormwood falling to earth and a subsequent invasion of locust creatures may speak of such non-sapient ETs. They come up out of a smoking pit [a crater] in the wake of Wormwood’s impact. Of course, it’s also possible that said locust creatures are indigenous to earth and are simply subterranean creatures we have not yet encountered set free by the blast. These are just speculations.Yet it should be noted that non-sapient ETs, even with intelligence on par with dolphins, apes or insects, pose no threat to any Bible doctrine. Genesis simply notes that God created creatures according to their kind, so we would expect xenomorphs to be classifiable by kinds. They would simply be subject to the same Fallen Universe we inhabit together.

  3. The possibility of sapient alien life.

    How would that jive with Biblical doctrine? I know that Jason Lisle has objected that sapient ETs would either need a Christ who died on their planet for them [which he correctly points out would violate the scripture that Christ died once for all… IF this passage applies not merely to men but to all sapient lifeforms! And that’s a stretch, guys.] or that these aliens would somehow need to accept the Terran Christ for salvation. I’m not sure his argument is valid. Since these aliens would not be of the bloodline of Adam it’s possible they would not ever need to be saved. One may object that moral choice would imply accountability. If sapient ETs are fallen and there is no way to ascertain this in advance, they would need a means of salvation. It does not follow that God will grace them with one, for an examination of Scripture makes it strongly suggestive that angels do not appear to have been offered redemption. If they do not have access to such salvation, their attitude toward mankind could only be hateful. If they do have access to salvation, would it be Christ? Or would they have a “schoolteacher” akin to the Mosaic Law and Judaic Temple system until we reach them with the Good News? [Didn’t think of that one, did you?] If they are not fallen, what would an encounter with them be like? Would they even want to contact us? This vein of thought offers some very interesting possibilities. David G. Johnson’s Chadash Chronicles proposes a world that is not under the effect of original sin or God’s election, a world set up as a sort of divine contest in the tradition of the testing of Job. Peter R Stone also has an interesting twist on this idea. In A Knight from Dein, some humans were transported to an alien world at the dispersion of Babel [so they were dispersed quite a bit further than other people groups!]. Their world is both fallen and unfallen [in sections] because God created two alien species there and set them up with a Garden of Eden type test: one fell and the other didn’t. There is no carnivory in the lush, unfallen lands and unsaved humans, etc, feel strong discomfort and conviction when they enter unfallen elven lands. Neither Johnson nor Stone’s scenarios negate the universal effects of the Adamic Fall; it simply notes a localized exception caused by a unique local phenomenon. Think of it this way: gravity isn’t negated when a rocket leaves the planet. Rather, other forces overcome gravity at a local level, allowing gravity to be overcome for that rocket. Similarly, Christians are localized unfallen effects [sort of]; we’ve been redeemed, even if it will take new resurrected bodies and a new heaven & earth to allow us to enjoy/realize our redeemed state. Likewise, we still have a sin nature as Christians because we inherited what I call the “spiritual genetics” of the Fall. The mind of Christ and a fallen mind war inside our heads, much as the physical alien inhabitants of Stone and Johnson’s worlds war with one another.

  4. Alien Invasion.

    By this, I mean an honest-to-goodness aliens take over the world scenario. Christian authors tend to shy away from this one unless they can tie it in to fallen angels and/or a set-up for the End of Days. If you’ve read Alien Intrusion, you know why this sort of alien invasion, reminiscent of the V series, is so compelling. UFO true believers tend to re-interpret end-times Bible prophecy to one of the following scenarios:

    • “Those who refuse to change and allow Mother Earth to evolve (presumably Christians) will be removed by flying saucers and destroyed, or taken to some other place. (This ia a counterfeit of the Christian premillennial view, in that if millions of Christians were to suddenly disappear…)
    • “That during a ‘rapture’ at the end of time, all UFO believers who have spiritually evolved will be taken to heaven or another plant, leaving behind the earth for its destruction.
    • “The ascended ones (UFO believers) will be whisked away. Some believe they will be returned after the earth has been cleansed (Armageddon).” [p.322]

    But what of the alien invasion stories that are more in the vein of War of the Worlds or Independence Day? Stephen Hawking has noted that aliens who visit this planet are not likely to be friendly. In fact, he’s on record as saying, “”If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.” In all likelihood, they would be planet plundering locusts, hopping from one resource rich world to another. While the universe is full of water and minerals, Earth offers one resource we haven’t yet seen anywhere else: protein and chlorophyll, found only in plants and animals. In other words: food and potential biofuel. If aliens manage to get here, not even nuclear weapons may deter them; if their starships are sufficiently shielded to make the journey, it means we’re probably not capable of penetrating their defenses. We could hope for a War of the Worlds ending, where viruses kill off the aliens, but history shows that the invaded area is usually more affected by the invaders’ diseases than the other way ’round! Our truest hope might be that there aren’t any aliens at all, merely alien technology sent into the void much as we’ve sent robots and machines in advance of biological subjects.  

  5. After Earth.

    Is it even Scripturally permissible to consider a universe where Earth is completely destroyed before End Times events in light of Biblical prophecy? Could the Bible still be true if a meteor shattered the planet or the sun went supernova? Could the speculative apologist possibly imagine a scenario where the Bible’s prophecies extend to an Earth 2.0? I admit I find this one difficult; it may prove impossible to Biblically reconcile this sci-fi scenario. 

  6. Time travel. As I wrote in another essay, there are definite limitations when writing about time travel from a Biblical point of view. God knows what will happen, meaning that history is in a sense already written. That means that the idea of going back in time to kill Hitler will never be realized. You can’t step on a butterfly in the past and cause America to lose the Revolution.

    These things are already realized and therefore cannot be changed. Any attempt to alter the timeline could result in something very much like what happened to Balaam, who intended to curse Israel when God had already blessed it. An angel would have slain him if it weren’t for the intervention of a beast of burden and a sudden look into the spiritual realm. Balaam ended up further blessing Israel. The point is that if we try to kill Hitler, we stand a good chance of being struck down by an invisible angel. Or maybe not. Balaam’s intended meddling had already been anticipated by God; if we’re able to act in the past or future, we can rest assured that history has already taken our meddling into account and came up with the result recorded in our history books despite our best efforts. The trilogy that follows Johnny Came Home will explore time travel.

  7. Superpowers!

    Most folks don’t realize that comic book heroes are science fiction. Most hero fiction at this point explains super beings with evolutionary appeals to the “next stage of human development.” There are lots of phenomenon and alleged human abilities that defy conventional explanation. How would we explain this in a biblical context? Oh, demonic possession is tempting. And I think it’s been done. It brings to mind the Biblical passage where Moses’ rod turned into a snake and the pharaoh’s magicians duplicated the feat. But if not divine or demonic intervention, how would we explain such phenomenon such as telepathy or levitation, if it ever developed? Would we capitulate to Darwin, or do we have a viable alternative theory? Is this potential locked away in all mankind, prohibited lest our sin nature allow us to use this power for great harm? [See? Found a viable explanation that quickly] I think it’s worth exploring, which is precisely why I wrote Johnny Came Home! On this vein, what about a future in which everyone could read one another’s minds? How would this development shape humanity? Would we become more honest and open, or just get better at lying? Would we want to know what everyone else was thinking? How would this affect media and other forms of communication? What would this ability reveal about people’s reactions to the Gospel?

  8. Artificial intelligence.

    What is the meaning of sapience? Will it occur inevitably with a sufficient [but as-yet-undefined] level of complexity as evolutionists suggest? Will artificial sapience ever be valid or will the programming only be very convincing, but never authentic? How will we draw that line? What social and religious issues would that raise? What about robot rights? Assuming true artificial sapience, will androids inherent our Fallen nature as adopted children subject to the same human moral flaws [by design!] and need salavation by Christ? Or would true sapience result in robotic lifeforms that are not fallen? How would THAT impact humanity? Would they share a networked groupmind or be individuals? In a Rapture scenario, would they gain a new body? [i.e. – would they share the promise with biological believers]. What if they had no body to begin with but we only had a virtual presence but true sapience nonetheless? This field of exploratory thought is rife with possibility, especially as our concept of a “robot” or android” has come to include biological machines. Whether a mechanical man, a biological robot [simulacrum/android], a nanite cloud or a “living program” bound by the Internet, there is an as-yet-unexplored possible tie-in between Revelation 13:15 and artificial intelligence.

  9. Pantropism.

    If the population continues to expand, some have proposed that humanity itself will have to be altered in order to remain viable as a species. We would have be genetically modified to inhabit previously untenable environs. For example, if equipped with gills and sundry other modifications, humanity could take to the oceans. Or perhaps we could adapt humans to live on near-airless Mars? How would original humanity relate to these metahumans? How would they look at us? Would they consider us out-dated or revere us as one would their ancestors? If metahumans were bred for military purposes what safeguards would we put in place to keep those who fight for us in check?

  10. Cyborgs.

    Where does the man end and machine begin? If the cyborg’s brain is integrated with a computer, where does programming end and free will begin? Some of these issues were explored in the most recent reboot of Robocop. Is the possibility of trans-humanity aka extropianism at all feasible? Can we genuinely download our essences or souls into a computer program and either inhabit any body we choose to be downloaded into or exist as a non-corporeal internet entity? Would this inspire a Matrix-like alternate reality? Would we even be aware of the difference?Would this in actuality be genocide wrapped in the false promise of eternal life? Who would be behind such a conspiracy?

  11. Future Faith.

    What does the church look like in the next 100 years? 200? Does anyone go to a building anymore or does worship take place in a virtual reality environment? What does faith look like on an alien planet? On a space station? What does post-alien invasion faith look like? Do we still have Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant adherents? Have we merged? Are we more fragmented? Are there all-new denominations and cults to contend with? What do other religions look like? Are the old religions which compete with Christianity still in place or has some new religion like technogaiaism taken their place? What does Christian compromise and apostasy look like in the future? Has their been a great falling away from the faith? Are Christians hunted or are they marginalized in a sea of new religions and ideologies? Are there exclusively Christian star colonies?

  12. Clones and created life forms. What if man creates life? Is this seen by the world as evidence for evolution or design? What if it too is sapient? What about clones? Do we have shared souls? No, that’s silly. It seems more valid to make them individuals, like twins. What religious or racial biases might this bring up?

    How would the Church respond? No, honestly. Could a sapient mutant or clone be a member of the clergy? What if said mutants or clones were genetically engineered to have “superpowers?” [Couldn’t resist!] Interestingly enough, the US Supreme Court decided in the 1980 Diamond v. Chakrabarty case that a patent could be issued to a person who invents or discovers “any” new and useful “manufacture” or “composition of matter,” and that the fact that such manufacture is a living organism is alive is without legal consequence for the purposes of patent law. This interpretation of U.S.C. § 101 [which reads: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.”] to allow for patents on a living micro-organism could potentially open up the door for a “manufactured” slave race. A footnote of Diamond v. Chakrabarty notes that:

    P. J. Federico, a principal draftsman of the 1952 recodification, in his testimony regarding that legislation:
    “[U]nder section 101, a person may have invented a machine or a manufacture, which may include anything under the sun that is made by man. . . .”
    Hearings on H.R. 3760 before Subcommittee No. 3 of the House Committee on the Judiciary, 82d Cong., 1st Sess., 37 (1951).

    Anything under the sun made by man would certainly include non-naturally occuring lifeforms created via genetic manipulation. While patent law prohibits the patenting of naturally occuring minerals, organisms and natural laws, there is no such prohibition regarding genetic experimentation until such point as Congress enacts a law specifically dealing with living organisms.
    As exploratory apologists, we’re faced with the question of how patentable [ownable] living machines might degrade the Biblical truth that we’re made in God’s image. Many evolutionists claim that all life is simply biological machinery and that intelligence and sapience is simply the result of sufficiently advanced complexity. Could a nanite cloud be considered

Of course, some will shrug and ask, why should we write about such things at all? Isn’t it a waste of time to write amusements and diversionary fictions. Don’t we have more important things to be on about? Like spreading the Gospel. And what does it really matter anyway?

I think Hank Hanegraaff’s reply to the question, “What made you write [The Last Disciple]?” is compelling:

“Fiction is a great truth-conveying medium. As Left Behind has become the vehicle for indoctrinating millions of believers into an end-time theology invented in the nineteenth century,” [aka Darbyism, or the Rapturist view]

Fiction, in general, is the perfect medium to make an argument. The more popular the novel, the more folks are exposed to the ideas and, as Hanegraaff put it, “indoctrinated.” They are at least more predisposed to accept the idea’s validity.

Science fiction has specific power to change the future. Many science fiction writers are considered futurists. Their imaginative exploration of possible futures has resulted in present-day technological inspiration. This is why I often refer to sci-fi as the thinking man’s genre. Unfortunately, it has also colored the worldviews of those who read science fiction, which is predominantly written with Darwinist, humanist and even atheist assumptions.

But we can write faith-based sci-fi, not only as anticipatory apologetic, but to provide the world with an intelligent alternative to humanist Imagineering.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s